One of many largest questions shaking up the blockchain trade now’s whether or not profitable initiatives ought to stay loyal to the Layer 1 (L1) blockchains or strike out on their very own and launch their very own native chains, a choice that would essentially alter the economics of networks like Solana.
Solana, with its excessive pace and low gasoline charges, has been on a meteoric rise over the previous few years. Its complete worth locked (TVL) has soared above $11 billion, largely fueled by the success of protocols like Jito, Jupiter, Raydium and different protocols. However right here’s the catch: all of this development hinges on one factor—initiatives staying put.
What occurs if essentially the most worthwhile functions, those driving Solana’s memecoin frenzy and DeFi growth, resolve they not want the community and migrate to their very own chains? May Solana’s financial mannequin unravel, its once-thriving income streams drying up as protocols transfer to seize extra worth for themselves?
So, is Solana—and, by extension, different L1s—constructed for the lengthy haul, or is the golden age of L1 dominance nearing its finish?
L1 blockchains have lengthy been the spine of crypto, however their continued existence has been partly due to the sheer exercise pushed by the protocols constructed on them. As an example, 5 protocols contribute 85% of Solana’s TVL.
Extra initiatives are opting to interrupt free from L1 chains and set up their very own devoted blockchains, pushed by the promise of decrease prices, larger customization, and full governance autonomy. As a substitute of being confined to the principles and limitations of a general-purpose L1, they’ll tailor their infrastructure, management transaction charges, and dictate governance insurance policies with out exterior interference.
Value effectivity is a significant component on this exodus. On an L1, community charges fluctuate wildly based mostly on demand, making transactions unpredictable and infrequently costly. For top-frequency merchants and DeFi platforms, these prices can add up shortly. Sovereign chains enable initiatives to set their very own financial fashions, guaranteeing secure and predictable charges that profit each builders and customers.
Then there’s customization. Whereas L1s like Ethereum and Solana provide strong ecosystems, they power protocols to adapt to predefined community buildings reasonably than optimizing for his or her distinctive wants. A venture launching its personal blockchain positive factors the liberty to tweak consensus mechanisms, block instances, and transaction processing speeds—a bonus that may be game-changing for sectors like gaming, DeFi, and high-speed buying and selling.
However maybe essentially the most compelling motive for this migration is governance. Protocols constructed on an L1 stay on the mercy of that community’s core builders and governance selections. A sudden change in transaction charges, validator incentives, or block manufacturing mechanisms can disrupt their whole operation. Shifting to a sovereign chain eliminates this danger, permitting initiatives to make selections that align solely with their imaginative and prescient and neighborhood pursuits.
A number of high-profile initiatives have already embraced this transition:
dYdX, a number one decentralized derivatives trade, initially launched on Ethereum however later migrated to a Cosmos-based sovereign chain. The transfer allowed dYdX to optimize its infrastructure for high-speed buying and selling whereas gaining full management over governance and transaction prices.
Jupiter, Solana’s second-largest protocol by TVL at $2.814 billion, is presently debating whether or not to comply with go well with, with proponents arguing {that a} devoted blockchain may improve efficiency and mitigate dangers tied to Solana’s community congestion or governance shifts.
Polygon, initially launched as an Ethereum Layer 2 (L2) scaling resolution, has since expanded right into a multi-chain community. With the introduction of Polygon Supernets and the Polygon CDK (Chain Growth Equipment), the venture is encouraging builders to construct application-specific chains that operate independently whereas nonetheless being interoperable with Ethereum.
DeFi protocols owe a lot of their success to the ecosystems that nurtured them, but the very nature of crypto encourages autonomy. The extra these initiatives develop, the extra they query whether or not they should hold paying hire to L1s after they may personal the land outright.
The attract of breaking free from Layer 1 (L1) blockchains is plain—decrease charges, full autonomy, and the power to fine-tune infrastructure to suit a venture’s precise wants.
However is sovereignty actually the golden ticket it seems to be?
Stepping away from a longtime L1 is greater than only a technical improve; it’s a high-stakes leap that comes with critical trade-offs. Whereas some protocols dream of independence, historical past has proven that L1s provide a basis that’s extremely troublesome to interchange.
One of many largest causes protocols thrive on L1s is liquidity. In DeFi, liquidity isn’t only a nice-to-have; it’s the lifeblood of the ecosystem. Ethereum, as an illustration, boasts over $60 billion in Complete Worth Locked (TVL)—a deep ocean of capital that only some blockchains can rival.
When a protocol launches on a serious L1, it immediately faucets right into a ready-made market of merchants, traders, and liquidity suppliers. However the second it decides emigrate to an impartial chain, issues get difficult.
Liquidity doesn’t simply comply with innovation—it follows comfort. Convincing customers and liquidity suppliers to maneuver to a brand new, unproven community isn’t any straightforward feat. dYdX needed to provide important incentives to lure customers to its new Cosmos-based chain. With out sturdy incentives, a venture dangers fragmenting its liquidity, creating skinny markets the place slippage will increase and buying and selling turns into much less environment friendly.
Then there’s safety. L1s like Ethereum and Solana have spent years battle-testing their networks, constructing strong validator participation and safe consensus mechanisms. A protocol that strikes to its personal chain should both recruit and keep its personal validator set or depend on a shared safety mannequin like Cosmos’ Interchain Safety. Neither choice is straightforward.
A weak validator set will be disastrous—working example: Meter (MTRG), a smaller Layer 1 community suffered a $4.4 million exploit in February 2022 as a consequence of vulnerabilities in its bridge safety. Attackers exploited poor validator incentives, minted further tokens, and drained the community’s liquidity. Many smaller chains have suffered related fates, struggling to determine the financial and technical safety wanted to stop assaults.
Past liquidity and safety, L1s present one other essential benefit: community results. The fantastic thing about an ecosystem like Ethereum is its composability—protocols don’t function in isolation; they combine, stack, and construct on one another. A lending protocol can join seamlessly with a buying and selling platform, a yield aggregator, or a liquidity pool, creating an interconnected internet of economic functions. That’s why initiatives like Uniswap, Aave, and Curve proceed to thrive on Ethereum; they’re leveraging the collective power of the ecosystem.
Alternatively, impartial chains should construct these connections from scratch. With out an energetic developer neighborhood and established infrastructure, they danger changing into remoted islands in an ocean of blockchain networks.
Even when a protocol manages to copy all these options, one remaining hurdle stays: consumer migration. Altering blockchains isn’t nearly decrease charges or technical enhancements—it’s about shifting consumer habits. Folks have a tendency to stay with what they know, and except there’s a compelling motive to modify chains, they received’t. Velocity, value financial savings, and scalability are nice promoting factors, however they will not be sufficient to beat the inertia of a well-established L1 ecosystem.
On the finish of the day, protocol sovereignty seems like a daring step ahead, but it surely’s a chance with no assured payoff. L1s provide extra than simply infrastructure; they supply safety, liquidity, and a thriving ecosystem that’s extremely troublesome to copy.
The continued debate over protocol sovereignty versus ecosystem dependency isn’t new. It echoes previous discussions in regards to the roles of Layer 1 , Layer 2 , and even the comparatively latest one about Layer 3 options in blockchain improvement.
RELATED: Are Layer 2 Options Enhancing Ethereum-or Killing It?
In the end, the blockchain trade isn’t a zero-sum sport. Whether or not L1 chains thrive or fade will rely not simply on their skill to retain protocols, however on how successfully they adapt to new fashions of scalability, governance, and interoperability.
If historical past is any indication, the way forward for blockchain won’t be outlined by a single dominant strategy however by a dynamic steadiness between innovation, sovereignty, and community collaboration. L1s, L2s, and even application-specific chains can coexist, every fulfilling totally different wants.
So, will impartial chains actually redefine the blockchain panorama, or will they wrestle towards the gravitational pull of L1 ecosystems? The reply may form the way forward for DeFi—and your complete blockchain trade.
Interoperability presents a compelling center floor. As a substitute of dropping high-value protocols fully, L1s may pivot to changing into seamless bridges between impartial chains, facilitating liquidity movement, governance coordination, and cross-chain composability. This transformation wouldn’t mark the tip of L1 relevance—it may very well be their subsequent nice evolution.
Simply because the web thrived by linking disparate networks reasonably than preserving them siloed, blockchain’s future could lie in connectivity reasonably than competitors. L1s that embrace this shift may safe their place not as walled gardens however because the highways enabling an interconnected, multi-chain world. The query isn’t whether or not L1s will survive—it’s whether or not they’ll adapt quick sufficient to stay on the centre of blockchain’s subsequent frontier.
Disclaimer: This piece is meant solely for informational functions and shouldn’t be thought of buying and selling or funding recommendation. Nothing herein must be construed as monetary, authorized, or tax recommendation. Buying and selling or investing in cryptocurrencies carries a substantial danger of economic loss. At all times conduct due diligence.
If you want to learn extra articles like this, go to DeFi Planet and comply with us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Fb, Instagram, and CoinMarketCap Group.
Take management of your crypto portfolio with MARKETS PRO, DeFi Planet’s suite of analytics instruments.”
