Charles Edwards, the founding father of Capriole Investments, has sparked important curiosity and debate throughout the cryptocurrency group. He heralded Ethena (ENA) as “the Luna of this cycle,” however with an important distinction: its financial fundamentals are deemed sustainable.
Edwards elaborated, “It’s 100% collateralized and the yield is variable based mostly on market forces. Two issues Luna wasn’t.” He additionally famous that at its zenith, Luna’s valuation exceeded ENA’s present market cap by greater than twenty-fold, but he cautioned, “ENA just isn’t risk-free, custody and execution danger exist.”
Ethena is the Luna of this cycle, besides the underlying economics are literally sustainable. It is 100% collateralized and the yield is variable based mostly on market forces. Two issues Luna wasn’t. At it is peak LUNA was over 20X larger than what ENA is now. ENA just isn’t danger free, custody…
— Charles Edwards (@caprioleio) April 10, 2024
Since its launch on April 2, ENA has seen a meteoric rise from underneath $0.30 to a excessive of $1.45. This rally is essentially attributed to Ethena Labs’ strategic enhancement of its rewards program, now in its “Season 2,” which presents a 50% reward increase for customers locking their ENA tokens for a minimum of seven days. This transfer goals to bolster person engagement and loyalty, fostering a sustainable ecosystem for the Ethena platform.
A exceptional facet of this ecosystem is the speedy development of its stablecoin, USDe, which has outstripped the availability development of established counterparts reminiscent of USDT, USDC, and DAI, reaching a $2 billion provide in simply over 100 days.
USDe is the quickest rising USD denominated asset within the historical past of crypto pic.twitter.com/xgiRJjf96t
— G | Ethena (@leptokurtic_) April 8, 2024
Nevertheless, the mission’s excessive yields that are generated by harnessing the spinoff markets and staked Ethereum have stirred skepticism amongst trade specialists. Fantom founder Andre Cronje, amongst others, has raised considerations in regards to the sustainability of those yields, that are the best in your entire crypto trade.
Dangers Concerned With Ethena
Noteworthy, ENA is commonly in comparison with Terra Luna (LUNA), however the variations couldn’t be a lot larger, as Edwards additionally famous. Whereas ENA just isn’t danger free, a demise just like the one in all LUNA is extremely unlikely. Regardless of that, buyers want to pay attention to different dangers concerned with ENA.
Diving deeper into the dialogue of dangers, CL (@CL207) from eGirl Capital presents an intriguing perspective on the habits of derivatives merchants. She clarifies, “It seems Ethena is making many individuals who don’t commerce derivatives have a very onerous time wrapping their heads round the truth that derivatives merchants are so genuinely retarded that we’re keen to pay like 50%+ APR to enter a place.”
Notably, final cycle crypto merchants have been bidding futures so excessive that Bitcoin quarterlies earned “a locked-in >50% apr. She added, “simply 50 days into 2021, we collectively paid 2,400,000,000$ in funding charges by the tip of 2021, the market has paid as a lot as a decently sized nation’s GDP.”
Monetsupply.eth (@MonetSupply) from Block Analitica supplies a granular evaluation of the dangers Andre Cronje highlighted. By means of his examination, a number of key areas of concern are outlined:
Oracle Threat: The potential affect on trade positions because of Ethena offering inaccurate quotes on minting or redeeming operations. Nevertheless, MonetSupply notes, “there’s price limits on this tho so max loss is constrained and counterparties are all whitelisted (can’t simply run away with the cash).”
Liquidation Threat: Deemed not a big issue because the portfolio is leveraged lower than 1x, suggesting a conservative strategy to borrowing and leverage.
Unfold Threat: The potential of elevated foundation resulting in larger funding income, which ought to theoretically entice inflows. Conversely, a damaging foundation may trigger outflows, however Ethena may benefit from closing hedged positions profitably.
Collateral Ratio Threat: Although liquid staking tokens (LSTs) are given lower than 100% weight on centralized exchanges (CEX), the general low leverage mitigates this danger. The proportion of LST in spot collateral is comparatively minor.
Custody Threat: Highlighted as one of many extra important considerations, given the reliance on custodians with a great observe file and the distribution of belongings throughout a number of entities.
Trade Solvency Threat: This danger might result in the lack of unsettled revenue and loss (PnL) and a few buying and selling prices to rehedge on different exchanges. Nevertheless, MonetSupply provides, “the Binance/ceffu nexus may change this evaluation although, are they really unbiased?”
Ethena Entity Threat: The inner danger associated to Ethena’s keys or authentication tokens being compromised, or a staff member appearing maliciously.
MonetSupply concludes that regardless of these dangers, the framework of overcollateralization on platforms like Morpho, the Maker surplus buffer, and the MKR backstop, supported by a considerable Proof of Liquidity (POL), serves as a strong mitigating issue.
At press time, ENA traded at $1.329.
Featured picture from Bitget, chart from TradingView.com
Disclaimer: The article is supplied for academic functions solely. It doesn’t signify the opinions of NewsBTC on whether or not to purchase, promote or maintain any investments and naturally investing carries dangers. You might be suggested to conduct your personal analysis earlier than making any funding choices. Use info supplied on this web site fully at your personal danger.
